Besides offering a competitive economic benefit from increased world-wide recognition, National Scenic Trails receive federal funding for maintenance and administration. In particular, national trails are eligible for annual federal funding for trail crews to clear, brush, and perform repairs. Since the Alaska Long Trail’s proposed route passes through many of Alaska’s most used outdoor spaces, the designation would open up funding to address the existing demand on our trails infrastructure. Read our Op-Ed in the Anchorage Daily News.

The federal oversight of the entire trail is limited to coordination and administration of the trail across multiple ownerships. A National Scenic Trail is federally administered, but not managed: a federal agency is assigned by Congress to administer the trail and coordinate with different state, federal, and local land managers along the trail route for matters of interagency agreements, financial assistance, and resource protection. Land managers maintain full control of land management policies, access, planning and development, visitor use, etc. For the existing national trail in Alaska - the Iditarod National Historic Trail - the administering agency is the BLM. Pages 29-30 (items (e) and (h)) of the National Trails System Act talk about management of trail segments on non-federal lands. The National Trails System Act only has jurisdiction over federal lands. ​ Secretaries of Interior or Agriculture only have jurisdiction over their corresponding lands (national parks, BLM, or national forests) and cannot dictate regulations to non-federal land managers. ​​ Typically, other NSTs in the country have a corresponding nonprofit that acts as a "manager" of the trail in addition to the federal administrator. An example in Alaska is the Iditarod National Historic Trail which is administered by the BLM and stewarded by the nonprofit Iditarod Historic Trail Alliance. As the INHT Trail Administrator, BLM facilitates efforts by volunteers and local, state and federal agencies on behalf of the entire trail.

The NST designation itself does not put special restrictions on land use. Land use policies are set by land managers (for example, municipalities, boroughs, state and federal agencies) that oversee specific trail segments. No federal agency takes control over any non-federal lands if a trail is designated. The management policies of existing segments do not get changed with the designation, and the management policies of future segments get decided by corresponding land managers (boroughs, municipalities, state agencies, etc). ​ Hunting and trapping are allowed along many national trails, especially on non-federal segments. Examples: Ice Age (Wisconsin): Open to hunting on state land. Appalachian Trail: Hunting is allowed on about 1,250 miles of the trail, which includes national forests, state forests, and game lands. North Country Trail: Many sections of the trail are open to hunting because it crosses through many types of public lands and landowners. Pacific Northwest Trail: The PNT does not affect regulations related to hunting and fishing, which are managed by the states and local landowners and land managers. Many sections of the trail are popular with hunters.

Yes, and other NSTs in the country incorporate motorized use (for example, the Continental Divide Trail) on federal lands. On non-federal lands, corresponding land managers make decisions about use and policies, including motorized use.​ In Alaska, another national trail - the Iditarod National Historic Trail - allows motorized use. The Frequently Asked Questions on the BLM site for the feasibility study specifically address the motorized use: Q: How are motorized uses managed on national scenic trails? A: While Section 7(c) of the National Trails System Act (Act) states that "the use of motor vehicles along any national scenic trail shall be prohibited," Section 7(j) allows vehicles to be permitted on certain trails. These may include, but need not be limited to, snowmobiles, motorcycles, bicycles, four-wheel drive or all-terrain offroad vehicles, and trail access for handicapped individuals. The feasibility study will examine the appropriateness of motorized trail use along the trail. If Congress designates the Alaska Long Trail as a national scenic trail, they can specify acceptable uses as they did with the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail, which permits the use of motorized vehicles on designated segments of the Continental Divide National Scenic Trail. Where allowed, the Act intends for motorized use to occur in accordance with regulations prescribed by the appropriate Secretary in accordance with other Federal laws, or any State or local laws. Q: What types of uses could be allowed on a national scenic trail? ​A: Potential trail uses allowed on designated components of the national trails system may include, but are not limited to, the following: bicycling, cross-country skiing, day hiking, equestrian activities, jogging or similar fitness activities, trail biking, overnight and long-distance backpacking, snowmobiling, and surface water and underwater activities. ​ While National Scenic Trails are primarily non-motorized on federal lands, section 7(c) of the National Trails System Act lists several exceptions to this and gives a significant amount of latitude to local land managers and the administering agency for determining what use policies are appropriate for which trail sections. This practice can be seen in other National Scenic Trails, for example the Continental Divide Trail: about 23% of the nearly 3,100 miles of the CDT are multi-use trail systems that include motorized use. Every time a new national trail is added to the system, the NTS Act gets amended with specific language about that trail. The Continental Divide NST is written in the Act with specific permissions for motorized use along the trail. Nothing precludes the Alaska Long Trail to be written into the Act with a similar language. ​

From “Reference Manual 45 – National Trails System 2019: “When the NTSA was first passed in 1968 it initially established two trails – the Appalachian and Pacific Crest NSTs. As a result, section 7(g) was made applicable to both trails and authorized the use of eminent domain as a last resort when all other means of trail corridor protection has failed. This was one of the most controversial aspects of the Act during Congressional hearings when it was being considered in 1967. The issue raised its head 10 years later when a new wave of trails was being considered for addition in the Act, and as things turned out, most of the trails added in 1978 and 1980 were not only prohibited from using this eminent domain authority, they were denied use of any federal funds at all to protect the trail corridor (with one minor exception). Starting in 1983, newly established NSTs and NHTs enjoyed (but seldom used) a compromise authority called the “willing seller” clause. Although there are variations, the basic language in each trail’s establishment clause stated: "No land or interest in land outside the exterior boundaries of any federally administered area may be acquired by the United States for the trail except with the consent of the owner of the land or interest in land."​ ​

The best place for information about the NSTs is the National Trails System Act 1968 and Reference Manual 45 – National Trails System 2019.The Act gets amended every time a trail gets designated. Another resource is the BLM's Alaska Long Trail NST feasibility study page.